🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.